Evolutionary Psychology is Capitalist Conjecture Masquerading as ‘Science’

Or why Steven Pinker is wrong about human nature

Sidenote: This is an excerpt from a paper I presented at the annual conference of the American Anthropological Association in November 2021. I initially feared that my paper was a bit too polemical for an academic setting, so I was elated when it was well received. But of course, I was among fellow anthropology enthusiasts, in an environment free of Steven Pinker’s mansplaining sycophants.

Neoliberal Nature and Hobbesian Hardwiring: A Critical Anthropological Analysis of Evolutionary Psychology Discourse

In recent decades, evolutionary psychology has become increasingly influential in the U.S. Promulgated by academics such as Steven Pinker, David Buss, and Robert Wright, it has reached beyond academia to permeate popular culture.

Countless evolutionary psychology books have been written for a popular audience, such as Pinker’s “The Blank Slate,” Wright’s “The Moral Animal,” Geoffrey Miller’s “The Mating Mind,” and Randy Thornhill’s “A Natural History of Rape: Biological Bases of Sexual Coercion” (yes, this book pseudoscientifically argues that rape is just “human nature”).